These provisions apply to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, even though the transaction occurred prior to its promulgation. Read more
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by law." It truly is perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents on the boy or Woman never approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they will do if they are able to Slash off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man that is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who presents this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by legislation.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), clearly distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion requires a shift to some higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, around the other hand, delivers financial relief by putting an employee in a very higher shell out scale, without modifying their job duties or position. It's a system designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained while in the same pay out scale for a lengthy time, particularly when they lack prospects for promotion. Upgradation is really a policy Resource used to alleviate the hardship of very long-term stagnation. Read more
However it is actually made very clear that police is free to take action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities subject matter to law. However no harassment shall be caused on the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of law. Police shall also assure respect from the family shed in accordance with legislation and if they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they are able to act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate like a issue of security on the house is concerned, which is not really public place under the Act 1977. nine. Thinking of the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has long been achieved. For that reason, this petition is hereby disposed of inside the terms stated higher than. Read more
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically bring on exoneration from departmental charges based within the same factual grounds. Although a writ under Article 199 is obtainable in specific limited situations, it's generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-analyze witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't encourage the department of his/her innocence.
In federal or multi-jurisdictional legislation systems there may perhaps exist conflicts between the varied lessen appellate courts. Sometimes these differences may not be resolved, and it might be necessary to distinguish how the regulation is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.
In certain jurisdictions, case law is often applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family regulation.
Article check here 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by legislation." It is actually properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
The Cornell Law School website offers many different information on legal topics, such as citation of case regulation, and even offers a video tutorial on case citation.
Any court could look for to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to succeed in a different summary. The validity of this type of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to your higher court.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent as well as case under appeal, Potentially overruling the previous case regulation by setting a fresh precedent of higher authority. This may possibly happen several times as being the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first with the High Court of Justice, later of the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his growth with the concept of estoppel starting in the High Trees case.
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to make sure the Act's effective implementation in line with its first purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor diploma(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more